HILLEL BEN SAMUEL

HILLEL BEN SAMUEL (c. 1220–c. 1295), physician, talmudic scholar, and philosopher. Since it has been held that Hillel lived in Verona, he has also been called Hillel b. Samuel of Verona; but, in fact, only his grandfather lived in that city. Little is known about Hillel's personality, place of birth, or life. It is known that he came from a rabbinic family, and that his grandfather, eliezer ben samuel , was a tosafist and av bet din at Verona. Hillel is first mentioned in a legal document of 1254. He lived in Naples and then in Capua, where he practiced medicine and studied philosophy with abraham abulafia . Earlier he had lived in Rome, where he became friendly with zerahiah b. shealtiel gracian and with the physician Isaac b. Mordecai (Maestro Gaio), who later served as the physician of Pope Nicholas IV. Most information about Hillel is derived from correspondence between him and these friends. Some scholars, relying upon Hillel's own, rather dubious, testimony, have concluded that between the years 1259 and 1262 Hillel lived in Barcelona, where he was a disciple of jonah gerondi . Hillel's statement that he studied medicine in Montpellier finds no corroboration in other sources. Hillel played a major role in the controversies of 1289–90 concerning   the philosophical works of Maimonides (see maimonidean controversy ). Defending Maimonides, Hillel addressed a letter to his friend Maestro Gaio asking him to use his influence with the Jews of Rome against Maimonides' opponents. He also advanced the bold idea of gathering together Maimonides' defenders and opponents in one of the towns on the shores of the Mediterranean, in order to bring the controversy before a court of Babylonian rabbis, whose decision would be binding on both factions. From a second letter to Maestro Gaio, it appears that Hillel's efforts were partially successful: the rabbis of Babylonia, Ereẓ Israel, and Italy supported his idea and placed a ban of excommunication on the instigator of the opposition to Maimonides, solomon b. abraham of montpellier . Both letters are included in Ḥemdah Genuzah (ed. by Ẓ.H. Edelmann (1856), 18a–22b). The first also appears in Ta'am Zekenim (ed. by A. Ashkenazi (1854), 70b–73a). Hillel's position may be understood against the background of the religious-philosophical controversy prevalent at that time among the Christians. Under the influence of Christian scholasticism, Hillel believed that the threat to faith stemmed from the adherents of averroes , whose views concerning the human intellect brought them to deny the immortality of the individual human soul. While Hillel generally followed Maimonides' rationalistic position, he deviated from Maimonides, who tended toward an allegorical interpretation of miracles and prophetic visions, by holding that these must be taken literally (see Oẓar Neḥmad, 2 (1857), 124–43). Hillel's major work is Tagmulei ha-Nefesh (written in 1288–91; published from an imperfect manuscript by S. Halberstamm in 1874). The book is divided into two parts. The first part, which itself contains seven sections and is the major portion of the book, deals with the nature of the soul and the intellect, and relies heavily on the earlier literature on this topic. Thus, the first two sections of the first part are mainly a translation of Dominicus Gundissalinus' De Anima, also called Liber Sextus Naturalium; the third and fifth sections are based on the Tractatus de Animae Beatitudine ("Treatise on the Beatitude of the Soul") attributed to Averroes; the sixth section is a copy of the three treatises by Averroes on the conjunction of the hylic and active intellects, from the Hebrew translation by Samuel ibn Tibbon; and the seventh is a translation of thomas aquinas ' De Unitate Intellectus. The second part of the book, which deals with the question of the soul's retribution, reflects the influence of Naḥmanides ' Sha'ar ha-Gemul. Hillel wrote this work, as he says, to explain the nature of the soul to the Hebrew reader in order to save him from the dangers inherent in blind, non-philosophical faith, on the one hand, and from the extreme conclusions of philosophic speculation, on the other. Hillel, in Tagmulei ha-Nefesh, maintains that the soul is a "formal substance" which is spiritual and emanates directly from the supreme being, God. The ultimate aim of the soul is to unite with the active intellect. On the question of whether there exists an infinite number of independent souls or a single soul for all individuals, Hillel follows Averroes in maintaining that there is a universal soul, from which the souls of individuals emanate like rays from the sun. However, while Averroes believed in collective immortality, Hillel, following Aquinas, believed in individual immortality. The arguments which Hillel used to prove that the immortality of the soul is individual were actually those of Thomas Aquinas. Hillel advanced these proofs of the individual immortality of the soul mainly in order to substantiate his notion of reward and punishment which he discusses in the second part of the work. In Hillel's view, which was also influenced by the Christian scholasticism of his day, the soul's retribution was spiritual rather than physical – its reward consisting in drawing close to God, its punishment in removal from God. Though Hillel does remain faithful to Jewish tradition in his description of Gan Eden and Gehinnom (heaven and hell), details of his description reflect the influence of Christian scholasticism. In addition to Tagmulei ha-Nefesh, Hillel wrote a commentary on the 25 propositions appearing at the beginning of the second part of the Guide, and three philosophical treatises, which were appended to Tagmulei ha-Nefesh: the first on knowledge and free will; the second on the question of why mortality resulted from the sin of Adam; the third on whether or not the belief in the fallen angels is a true belief. It is uncertain whether the commentaries on three philosophical treatises by Maimonides (published in Ḥemdah Genuzah, 31b–36a) which are attributed to Hillel were actually written by him. In Tagmulei ha-Nefesh Hillel mentions a work that he wrote himself, entitled Ma'amar ha-Darban (or ha-Darkan), dealing with tales of miracles in the aggadah. However, preserved excerpts of the work (Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, Cod. Héb., 704; published by Goldblum in Mi-Ginzei Yisrael be-Paris, 1894) offer only an explanation of philosophical terms. Hillel also translated the pseudo-Aristotelian Liber de causis under the title Ma'amar Lamed Bet Hakdamot (extracts contained in Tagmulei ha-Nefesh). In composing this translation he apparently relied on Aquinas' commentary on this work. He also translated several important medieval works from Latin into Hebrew, which served in his time as textbooks for teaching medicine: (1) Sefer Keritut (Chirurgia Magna) of Bruno de Lungoburgo, which was written in 1254 (Parma, De Rossi Ms. 1281; the preface is found in Tagmulei ha-Nefesh, 43a–44b); (2) parts of Hippocrates' Aphorisms with Galen's commentaries; and (3) Melekhet Ketannah, Galen's Micra Techne, according to the Latin translation by Gerard of Cremona. Hillel, whose strength lay in his translations rather than in his original philosophical works, was a characteristic figure of the height of the scholastic period. The subjects with which he dealt, especially the question of the soul's retribution, are also dealt with by Thomas Aquinas, Dante, and immanuel of rome . Despite his rationalism, Hillel emphasized, to a greater extent than did his predecessors, the dangers to faith inherent in philosophic speculation. Hillel's importance in the history of medieval Jewish philosophy results from his attempt to deal systematically with the question of the immortality of the soul, which Maimonides had avoided discussing at length.   -BIBLIOGRAPHY: Guttmann, Philosophies, 157, 197–200; Husik, Philosophy, 312–27; Teicher, in: Tarbiz, 7 (1936), 366, 372; Steinschneider, Uebersetzungen, index; Vogelstein-Rieger, 1 (1896), 400–10, 415–8; Elbogen, in: Annuario di studi ebraici, 2 (1935–37), 99–105; J.B. Sermoneta, in: World Congress of Jewish Studies, Synopses of Lectures, 4 (1961). (Joseph Baruch Sermoneta)

Encyclopedia Judaica. 1971.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Hillel ben Samuel — (* um 1220; † um 1295) oder Hillel von Forlì, war ein während des späten 13. Jahrhunderts in Italien wirkender Arzt und philosophierender Theologe. Er setzte sich kritisch mit averroistischen Ansichten seiner Zeit auseinander, trat zwar im… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Hillel ben Samuel — ▪ Jewish physician and scholar also called  El al Ben Shachar   born c. 1220 died c. 1295       physician, Talmudic scholar, and philosopher who defended the ideas of the 12th century Jewish philosopher Maimonides (Maimonides, Moses) during the… …   Universalium

  • Hillel ben Samuel — (fl. 13th cent)    Italian physician, talmudic scholar and philosopher. He lived in Rome, Naples and finally Capua, where he practised medicine. He played a major role in the contro versies of 1289 90 concerning the philosophical writings of… …   Dictionary of Jewish Biography

  • Joseph ben Samuel Bonfils — (lived in the middle of the eleventh century) was a French rabbi, Talmudist, Bible commentator, and payyeṭan . Of his life nothing is known but that he came from Narbonne, and was rabbi of Limoges in the province of Anjou [See Jacob Tam s Sefer… …   Wikipedia

  • Eliezer ben Samuel of Verona — (lived about the beginning of the thirteenth century) was an Italian Jewish tosafist.He was a disciple of Rabbi Isaac the elder, of Dampierre, and grandfather of the philosopher and physician Hillel of Forli. He had sanctioned the second marriage …   Wikipedia

  • ABULAFIA, ABRAHAM BEN SAMUEL — (1240–after 1291), founder of the prophetic Kabbalah. Born in Saragossa, Spain, Abulafia moved to Tudela in his childhood and studied with his father until the latter s death in 1258. In 1260 he left Spain for the Land of Israel in search for the …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • BARUCH BEN SAMUEL OF MAINZ — (c. 1150–1221), scholar and paytan. Baruch was a pupil of Moses b. Solomon ha Kohen, whom he succeeded as a member of the bet din of Mainz. There is no basis for Aptowitzer s statement that a dispute for the position between him and his kinsman,… …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • ELIEZER BEN SAMUEL OF VERONA — (early 13th century), Italian tosafist. Eliezer was a pupil of Isaac b. Samuel of Dampierre (Roke aḥ 377) and the teacher of avigdor b. elijah Kohen Ẓedek of Vienna. He was a colleague of eleazar b. judah of Worms and of Abraham b. Moses of… …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • Haim Hillel Ben-Sasson — Pour les articles homonymes, voir Sasson. Haim Hillel Ben Sasson (1914 1977) est un historien du judaïsme et un spécialiste de l histoire du peuple juif. Il est notamment le directeur d ouvrage de A History of the Jewish People (1969),… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Hillel — is a Hebrew name of several prominent historical men and modern organizations. People named Hillel Biblical* Hillel was the father of Abdon, a minor character in the Book of Judges. * Hellel ben Shakhar is mentioned in means son of dawn , a… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.